Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 10:13:13 +0100 (MET) From: J Wunsch <j@uriah.heep.sax.de> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org (FreeBSD-current users) Subject: Re: perl4 Message-ID: <199603200913.KAA07672@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199603200347.TAA09181@precipice.shockwave.com> from "Paul Traina" at Mar 19, 96 07:47:24 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Paul Traina wrote: > If I write C versions of these scripts, will that suffice > to break perl off into a package? > > Hear hear! This is a good thing(TM)! It ain't, but we've been there before. :) > By the way, which is inherantly > broken when executed as any sort of script. It needs to be a shell builtin > or it needs to die. Huh? #!/bin/sh, #!/bin/csh aren't shell builtins either. In fact, all these scripts are acceptable to execve(2), and the shell won't even notice the difference to a binary executable. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199603200913.KAA07672>