Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 15:04:34 -0700 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Question about Motif packages Message-ID: <199604102204.PAA19312@sunrise.cs.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <199604101952.VAA01131@uriah.heep.sax.de> (message from J Wunsch on Wed, 10 Apr 1996 21:52:25 %2B0200 (MET DST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* > (2) What is the imake support like? Do they leave "xmkmf" alone,
* > providing an extra "mxmkmf" or do they clobber lib/X11/config/* to
* > the state that "xmkmf" isn't the same anymore?
*
* Perhaps not use the wrapper (should it even exist), but pick something
* like
*
* imake -DUseInstalledMotif -DUseInstalled \
* -I${MOTIFBASE}/lib/X11/config
*
* instead?
Hmm, we use "xmkmf -a", which does a whole lot more than just a single
imake. I don't think we want to get into that.
As I said in my mail explaining the bsd.port.mk changes, libraries are
not hard to handle at all, so I'm not worried, xmkmf with explicit
Motif references should work fine. We'll have to see more about
include files I guess.
Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604102204.PAA19312>