Date: Thu, 11 Apr 1996 11:57:03 -0700 From: "Amancio Hasty Jr." <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: wong@rogerswave.ca (Wong), roell@blah.a.isar.de, hackers@FreeBSD.org, roell@xinside.com Subject: Re: The F_SETOWN problem.. Message-ID: <199604111857.LAA02569@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 11 Apr 1996 11:04:06 PDT." <199604111804.LAA04310@phaeton.artisoft.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>> Terry Lambert said: > > > AST's are easy. It's the stacks they need to run while your program > > > is already using your only stack that are annoying. Is this a problem? Lets look it at it from a different angle what happens when the user's process stack space is exhausted-- the process dies. So what is wrong with allocating a fix sized stack for handling ast events? Amancio
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604111857.LAA02569>