Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 13:05:19 +0200 From: Wolfram Schneider <wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> Cc: Paul Richards <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk>, bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Files installed to /etc, (was: review request) Message-ID: <199604301105.NAA00655@localhost> In-Reply-To: <3285.830859605@critter.tfs.com> References: <199604301010.LAA17456@cadair.elsevier.co.uk> <3285.830859605@critter.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp writes: >> > > /usr/share/etc >> > >> > That would be obviously wrong. It is >not< shareable, now even inside >> > the same architecture. >> >> Why isn't it? Until it's edited and installed in /etc it should be just >> a template that would be host independant and entirely shareable? > >Yes, host independent, but not architecture independent... > >/etc/rc for instance has to be architecture dependent to initialize >weird HW... /usr/share/syscons is architecture dependent too.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604301105.NAA00655>