Date: Tue, 21 May 1996 00:03:18 -0500 (CDT) From: Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM> To: terry@lambert.org Cc: bmah@cs.berkeley.edu, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ip masquerading Message-ID: <199605210503.AAA19856@compound.Think.COM> In-Reply-To: <199605210430.VAA29860@phaeton.artisoft.com> (message from Terry Lambert on Mon, 20 May 1996 21:30:39 -0700 (MST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Date: Mon, 20 May 1996 21:30:39 -0700 (MST) > Host, protocol could be encoded in the port number. You have *got* to be kidding! Hey, I'm not the one who wants to recover state. I'm just trying to scam out how it could be done. You've got a good 15.97 bits to work with... > > It would be nice to pull out the rewriting stuff into loadable > > rule sets. > > It would be nicer to not need them. > > Not an option, though, is it? It is for a real proxy. 8-). "real" proxies are still rewriting packets. They're just spending a lot more to do it. That's okay, though. The point is to make it work, not to make it work efficiently.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199605210503.AAA19856>