Date: Sun, 07 Jul 1996 01:30:51 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty <hasty@rah.star-gate.com> To: grog@lemis.de (Greg Lehey) Cc: michaelh@cet.co.jp (Michael Hancock), hackers@freebsd.org (FreeBSD Hackers) Subject: Re: gcc lies? Message-ID: <199607070830.BAA00607@rah.star-gate.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 07 Jul 1996 09:42:36 %2B0200." <199607070742.JAA15222@allegro.lemis.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dumb question , is gcc-1.42 a lot faster than gcc-2.x? Tnks, Amancio >From The Desk Of Greg Lehey : > Michael Hancock writes: > > > > This is probably why BSDI uses gcc 1.x for the kernel and gives their > > screaming customers 2.7.2. > > Hey, you're right, even BSD/OS 2.1 still uses gcc 1.42. You'd think > they would have got their act together by now. But I remember the > background: there was something to do with kernel structures being > aligned differently under gcc 2.x. You'd think they would have it > fixed by now, though. > > Greg >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199607070830.BAA00607>