Date: Sun, 25 Aug 1996 08:55:41 -0500 (CDT) From: Joe Greco <jgreco@brasil.moneng.mei.com> To: rls@shell.id.net (Robert Shady) Cc: jsuter@bsd.intrastar.net, ulf@Lamb.net, kyricc@inetnebr.com, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 128k ISDN vs. T1 Message-ID: <199608251355.IAA29158@brasil.moneng.mei.com> In-Reply-To: <199608250154.VAA15557@shell.id.net> from "Robert Shady" at Aug 24, 96 09:54:12 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Sorry to be rude, but another "Wanna-be-ISP". First it looks like you should > > go and read more about what is possible in telecommunication hardware. > > Like that ISDN is not upgradable over that 128K. That there exist Fractional > > T1. Frame Relay. And so on and so on. > > Well, obviously another clueless "thinks-he's-an-isp"... Ever hear of > ISDN PRI? We're running 23 channels of ISDN here, works rather well... ISDN PRI? You are suggesting multiplexing > 2 ISDN B's? Eeeeccch... I think I have to agree with the original poster... since "technically possible" and "something you would want to do" are two very different things. At the point where you are doing that, why NOT go with F-T1? It is designed precisely to cope with that sort of thing. Making ISDN do it is like trying to hammer a screw into a wall. ... JG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199608251355.IAA29158>