Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 08:50:02 -0400 From: "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> To: "Gary Palmer" <gpalmer@freebsd.org> Cc: rohit@cs.UMD.EDU, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Giant Sized Ethernet Packets Message-ID: <199609191250.IAA27562@whizzo.transsys.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 19 Sep 1996 05:15:07 EDT." <27177.843124507@orion.webspan.net> References: <27177.843124507@orion.webspan.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> rohit@cs.UMD.EDU wrote in message ID > <199609190233.WAA18658@darling.cs.UMD.EDU>: > > I was wondering if it is possible to send giant sized ethernet packets (>1500 > > bytes say 1550) using the current 'de' driver for the SMC 10/100 DEC 21140 > > cards. > > > If not, would somebody know if this is possible with the above h/w > > at all? > > > Any pointers to other h/w over which giant packets are possible would > > be appreciated. > > You can't without violating the IEE 802.3 specs for Ethernet, from > what I remember. To go to larger packet sizes use FDDI. Yeah, but if you're in an environment where the links are running full duplex and are connected to a Fast Ethernet switch, then you don't have to worry about the collision domain not working "correctly". Being able to support FDDI MTUs would eliminate needless fragmentation which is very time consuming to perform in routers. I'd love to have FDDI (or larger!) size MTU support in Fast Ethernet VLSI. I think that this is likely going to be part of Gigabit ethernet as it develops, and I think we'll eventually see something for Fast Ethernet too, based on converstations with router vendors. Heck, compare the cost of a small Fast Ethernet switch (like the Bay Networks 58000) with an equivilently sized DEC Gigaswitch. And you can't easily find FDDI that runs full duplex, either. Louis Mamakos
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199609191250.IAA27562>