Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Oct 1996 15:26:17 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de
Cc:        terry@lambert.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: root only: (was Re: comments on this change please.)
Message-ID:  <199610232226.PAA10607@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <199610232120.XAA28160@uriah.heep.sax.de> from "J Wunsch" at Oct 23, 96 11:20:56 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Actually, if my machine is a primary server, I still want to be able
> > to mount / read-only.  Since /etc is a subdirectory of / and not a
> > mount point, I*don't*want*any*local*configuration*files*in*/etc.
> 
> Regardless how many asterisks you put in there, you already lose.
> There are tons of local config files in and under /etc.

The question is whether or not they can be static enough to burn a
CDROM and boot from it, or statis enough that I can mount one / and
a seperate /var (as a memfs, ideally) on 250 machines in a student
lab.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610232226.PAA10607>