Date: Sat, 23 Nov 1996 15:53:50 -0700 From: Steve Passe <smp@csn.net> To: dg@Root.COM Cc: freebsd-smp@freefall.freebsd.org, Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.dialix.com> Subject: Re: SMP -current merge Message-ID: <199611232253.PAA20073@clem.systemsix.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 23 Nov 1996 14:44:48 PST." <199611232244.OAA01965@root.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Hi,
>>If there are 2 CPUS smp_kickoff() creates 2 idleprocs, and thus there
>>are 2 possible processess that can be in the idleq.
>
> Oh...I didn't realize that it was handled this way. This is going to need
>to be re-thought. The idle processes should probably not be on any of the
>queues and handled as a special case. Otherwise they will compete for CPU
>with other idprio processes, and that would be bad.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
perhaps I'm incorrect in my thinking here, I thought the idleq was strictly
for the cpuidle[ NCPU ] processes. What other "idle" processes are there?
--
Steve Passe | powered by
smp@csn.net | FreeBSD
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: 2.6.2
mQCNAzHe7tEAAAEEAM274wAEEdP+grIrV6UtBt54FB5ufifFRA5ujzflrvlF8aoE
04it5BsUPFi3jJLfvOQeydbegexspPXL6kUejYt2OeptHuroIVW5+y2M2naTwqtX
WVGeBP6s2q/fPPAS+g+sNZCpVBTbuinKa/C4Q6HJ++M9AyzIq5EuvO0a8Rr9AAUR
tBlTdGV2ZSBQYXNzZSA8c21wQGNzbi5uZXQ+
=ds99
-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199611232253.PAA20073>