Date: Tue, 1 Apr 1997 16:55:20 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams) Cc: terry@lambert.org, nate@mt.sri.com, proff@suburbia.net, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Internal clock Message-ID: <199704012355.QAA12469@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199704012221.PAA09736@rocky.mt.sri.com> from "Nate Williams" at Apr 1, 97 03:21:25 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > If, for example, the character device driver to system interface > > were relatively static (which it could be if it were well designed > > and thought out in the first place, instead of being incrementally > > revised every Tuesday),.... > > If 'ifs and butts were candy and nuts, we'd all have a Merry Christmas.' We *have* a well designed and thought out device interface: devfs. I have *no* idea what is preventing you from making it the default mechanism. (Do you think I would have engaged in this discussion if I did not already have answers to the questions which I would be asking?). Regards, Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704012355.QAA12469>