Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 20 Apr 1997 15:49:55 -0700 (MST)
From:      Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
To:        toor@dyson.iquest.net (John S. Dyson)
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: You will need to recompile your libc and apps!!!
Message-ID:  <199704202249.PAA12412@phaeton.artisoft.com>
In-Reply-To: <199704160401.XAA03609@dyson.iquest.net> from "John S. Dyson" at Apr 15, 97 11:01:18 pm

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> There is a serious bug in popen that has gone undetected until now.  I
> have just committed a fix that makes the shared address space vfork
> problem go away (which was due to the popen boo-boo.)  I will not
> be committing the fix to vfork until people have a chance to recompile
> their libc and re-link their apps with the corrected library.

Just a heads up...

To build the new libc, you will need to be running a version of 'ld'
that understands the "-O" option.

You will also need to update /usr/share/mk/* to be able to do the
build because of the .include dependencies.

If you update/usr/share/mk/*, then you will need to have a version
of 'ld' that undestands the "-O" option to build *ANY* library,
not just libc.


The nifty thing about getting an 'ld' that understands "-O" is that
you will need the entrire GCC build tree to build it because it's
not a self-contained port.

Why are /usr/src/lib/libc/sys/Makefile.inc and /usr/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk
using "ld -O <name> -r -x <name>" instead of "strip -x <name>"?

...Probably to make life complicated for anyone who decides to
upgrade libc by simply building it.  8-(.


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704202249.PAA12412>