Date: Thu, 01 May 97 10:10:41 +0800 From: "Ronald Wiplinger" <ronald@trace.com.tw> To: "freebsd-isp" <freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Fwd: Re: ET5025 to FreeBSD switched Message-ID: <199705010210.KAA16898@linkou.trace.com.tw>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hopefully somebody has an idea what is going on here ;-) I use a router card from ET. It worked very well under Linux. I witched it to FreeBSD, because it should get it's own machine, and because Dennis recomended for a better performance FreeBSD rather than Linux. I swapped the cards, compiled, .... it seems to work, all dialup user can go out through the router card, .... Next day when my staff came, noone on the Lan can go out. And here we are since more than one week. Attached is the last message I exchanged with Dennis. At 02:28 AM 5/1/97 +0800, you wrote: >Dennis, > >I have no idea, why we still have problems with our LAN. We can reach any machine in our network, we >can ping any machine outside of our LAN, ... look at the output of one Win95 machine: The routing is no different than with any other unix system....i'm afraid I cant debug your routing for you. I would suggest that you try to figure out whats happening to the packets with the debugger or other means (like l2stats and netstat -p ip) Dennis > > >C:\WIN95\Desktop>netstat -r > >Route Table > >Active Routes: > > Network Address Netmask Gateway Address Interface Metric > 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 203.67.189.254 203.67.189.12 1 > 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 203.67.189.0 255.255.255.0 203.67.189.12 203.67.189.12 1 > 203.67.189.12 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 > 203.67.189.255 255.255.255.255 203.67.189.12 203.67.189.12 1 > 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 203.67.189.12 203.67.189.12 1 > 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 203.67.189.12 203.67.189.12 1 > >Active Connections > > Proto Local Address Foreign Address State > TCP win95:1033 w3.hinet.net:80 ESTABLISHED > > >As you can see, it establishes the connection, but no data are comming. > > >On the same LAN, I have other machines, like OS/2, Linux, but they do not have problems. Here one >output from the OS/2 machine: > > >[C:\]netstat -r > > destination router netmask refcnt use flags snmp intrf > metric > default 203.67.189.254 0.0.0.0 1 3166 UG 0 lan0 > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 1 8 UH 0 lo > 203.67.189.0 203.67.189.10 255.255.255.0 0 0 U 0 lan0 > 203.67.189.1 203.67.189.10 255.255.255.255 9 691 UH 0 lan0 > 203.67.189.10 203.67.189.10 255.255.255.255 2 20 UH 0 lan0 > 203.67.189.108 203.67.189.10 255.255.255.255 0 4 UH 0 lan0 > 203.67.189.116 203.67.189.10 255.255.255.255 0 4 UH 0 lan0 > 203.67.189.124 203.67.189.10 255.255.255.255 0 5 UH 0 lan0 > 203.67.189.254 203.67.189.10 255.255.255.255 1 5 UH 0 lan0 > >Here it is much better. I cannot finish this full packed page, but at least I get 99%. > >Do you have any ideas? > .... for more information use: * http://www.trace.com.tw * gopher://gopher.trace.com.tw * ftp://ftp.trace.com.tw * telnet://bbs.trace.com.tw * sticky: Ronald gate.trace.com.tw (the very fast way to reach me) * for talk, InterCom (picture phone) ronald@gate.trace.com.tw * Tel: +886 2 609-0652, Fax: +886 2 600-0132, NET: +886 2 600-2318 Ronald Wiplinger [Taipei, 24h online]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705010210.KAA16898>