Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 14 May 1997 23:26:26 -0600 (MDT)
From:      Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc:        David Nugent <davidn@labs.usn.blaze.net.au>, current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RELENG_2_2 
Message-ID:  <199705150526.XAA00025@rocky.mt.sri.com>
In-Reply-To: <17811.863652120@time.cdrom.com>
References:  <199705141817.EAA01334@labs.usn.blaze.net.au> <17811.863652120@time.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > What happens when a user loses mail or has his/her mailbox
> > trashed when there is a locking collision/race caused by
> > dtmail and the local delivery agent using different locking
> > methods?
> 
> We've been over this, and the feeling is that while this dysfunction
> is bad, to someone who's on a disconnnected workstation and always
> serializes access to the mailbox anyway (fetch mail via POP then read
> it with dtmail), it's better than having dtmail simply refuse to
> work at all.

Umm, so you are basically stating that *unless* you don't have a local
delivery agent, or you can guarantee that the delivery will never happen
when you're using dtmail it will work.

That's should like a pretty typical workstation setup (NOT!).



Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705150526.XAA00025>