Date: Thu, 15 May 1997 12:15:10 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> Cc: rcarter@consys.com (Russell L. Carter), pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co, fenyo@email.enst.fr, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cluster Computing in BSD Message-ID: <199705151815.MAA01989@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199705151725.KAA15126@phaeton.artisoft.com> References: <199705151553.IAA22312@conceptual.com> <199705151725.KAA15126@phaeton.artisoft.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> > The difference between "could" and "does" is the > > reason for the failure of (nearly) every business unit that sold > > highly parallel/cluster systems. > > Except Goodyear. And Thinking Machines Corp. And Cray Computing. > And Cray Research. And Fujitsu. And... Hmm, how many of these are still in business selling highly parallel systems? Sounds like failure to me... Natehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199705151815.MAA01989>