Date: Wed, 18 Jun 1997 12:10:49 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: John Robert LoVerso <loverso@opengroup.org> Cc: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>, Peter Dufault <dufault@hda.com>, mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3c589d and ep0 Message-ID: <199706181810.MAA04323@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199706181652.MAA22232@postman.opengroup.org> References: <nate@mt.sri.com> <199706181609.KAA03898@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199706181652.MAA22232@postman.opengroup.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Suspend/resume with pccards don't work in FreeBSD, and haven't for a long > > time (except for somewhat randomly). > > Hmmm, in my limited experience of a TI TravelMate 5200 + a 3c389c, I've > never had a problem with suspend/resume. I use the PAO code, of course. 'Except for somewhat randomly'. It used to work on my ThinkPad, but quit working. It never worked on my NEC reliably, although occasionally it worked. > Do you mean "don't work in FreeBSD without the PAO code", or am I just lucky? Don't work at all. > While I'm at it, I might as well as ask what is the timeframe with pulling > in the APM changes from the PAO into some official branch of FreeBSD? Last I looked, the APM changes in the PAO code added no new necessary functionality, and only moved the code around. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199706181810.MAA04323>