Date: Wed, 30 Jul 1997 16:24:45 -0700 From: Sean Eric Fagan <sef@Kithrup.COM> To: jlemon@americantv.com, stephen@farrell.org Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: linux jdk (v1.1.1-v3 and v1.1.3-pre-v1) on 2.2-STABLE/2.2.2 Message-ID: <199707302324.QAA07729@kithrup.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
>This ktrace shows that syscalls are being made to mincore(). Now, I'm >admittedly not familiar with the linux emulation code, but I don't think >that mincore() is a linux syscall, at least it isn't listed in the linux >syscalls.master file. However, under BSD, the syscall number for mincore() >is 78, while under linux, gettimeofday() == 78. > >gettimeofday() appears to be a more likely syscall than mincore(). > >It almost appears that somehow this process has 'forgotten' that it is an >emulated linux process, and is calling the native BSD routines directly. > >Would this make any sense? ktrace only grabs the system call number, but doesn't know anything about emulated systems; as a result, it can't do a translation from syscall number to any name other than BSD. This is something I'm thinking about, although not for ktrace. Sean.help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707302324.QAA07729>