Date: Sat, 31 Jan 1998 05:15:17 -0500 (EST) From: "John S. Dyson" <dyson@FreeBSD.ORG> To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, tlambert@primenet.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: LFS is nuked? Message-ID: <199801311015.FAA06245@dyson.iquest.net> In-Reply-To: <4362.886232468@critter.freebsd.dk> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Jan 31, 98 08:41:08 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp said: > In message <199801310108.UAA23804@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollman write > s: > ><<On Sat, 31 Jan 1998 00:04:04 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet. > >com> said: > > > >> Of course, we all know that once something is in the attic, it's > >> bound to be studiosly attended to, just like the XNS, ISO, and > >> X.25 code have all been fixed... > > > >But unlike XNS, ISO-CLNS, and X.25, LFS might actually be of value to > >real users. > > ... But appearantly not enough added value to make anybody actually > make it work. > > QED: The attic is the right place. > > And yes, personally I belive that portals & unionfs could go the same > way... > Actually, portals and unionfs are *much* closer to being worked on. -- John | Never try to teach a pig to sing, dyson@freebsd.org | it just makes you look stupid, jdyson@nc.com | and it irritates the pig.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199801311015.FAA06245>