Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1998 17:57:15 -0500 (CDT) From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@gnu.org> To: toor@dyson.iquest.net Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk, gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: kernel support for memory semaphores/locks... Message-ID: <199804072257.RAA26476@detlev.UUCP> In-Reply-To: <199804072207.RAA00588@dyson.iquest.net> (toor@dyson.iquest.net) References: <199804072207.RAA00588@dyson.iquest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> No, you'd go to sleep for a jiffy and check again... I belive a >> yield() syscall is in the pipeline or maybe already in. > Yield is in the kernel. Is yield() the same as sleep(0)? Best, joelh -- Joel Ray Holveck - joelh@gnu.org - http://www.wp.com/piquan Fourth law of programming: Anything that can go wrong wi sendmail: segmentation violation - core dumped To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199804072257.RAA26476>