Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 00:47:14 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au> Cc: "John S. Dyson" <toor@dyson.iquest.net>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Fix for undefined "__error" and discussion of shared object versioning Message-ID: <19980528004714.19214@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <199805261836.LAA00466@dingo.cdrom.com>; from Mike Smith on Tue, May 26, 1998 at 11:36:54AM -0700 References: <19980526194334.44185@follo.net> <199805261836.LAA00466@dingo.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, May 26, 1998 at 11:36:54AM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: > > On Tue, May 26, 1998 at 11:59:52AM -0500, John S. Dyson wrote: > > > I really don't think that we would want to also get into compiler > > > support issues. Tool support issues are complex enough. I can imagine > > > that egcs (could) be stable enough for our c++ compiler, but am much > > > less confident of it being our default c compiler. > > > > Personally I'd prefer to use TenDRA if at all possible. It seems to > > be much better than GCC when you look at error control etc. > > How much of the world will build with it? Too little at the moment, I'd guess - but I don't know. I'm trying to find out if getting the kernel compiled is possible first. That's what's been the hurdle for compiling other Unixen with TenDRA. Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980528004714.19214>