Date: Thu, 04 Jun 1998 22:39:21 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: dima@best.net Cc: committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FD_SETSIZE Message-ID: <199806041439.WAA24579@spinner.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 02 Jun 1998 21:03:27 MST." <199806030403.VAA25906@burka.rdy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dima Ruban wrote: > Hey guys! > > -current has Subject defined to 1024, -stable - to 256. > Any objections from bumping it in -stable, so it would match > value that we have in -current? If I recall correctly, the -current select() implementation was enhanced to make better use of memory and copyin/out with large vector sizes. This has not happened with -stable, so increasing the vector size might not be an idea as it could have a [slight?] detrimental effect. I don't remember the details of the situation well enough but I am pretty sure that there was some reason why it wasn't taken across. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> Netplex Consulting To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806041439.WAA24579>