Date: Fri, 5 Jun 1998 10:32:27 -0400 (EDT) From: Glen Foster <gfoster@gfoster.com> To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: future of -STABLE (was: kernel compile problem) Message-ID: <199806051432.KAA19172@gfoster.intr.net>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
What are the plans for a 3.0-STABLE branch? Would this be a natural aftermath of a 3.0-RELEASE? Or, perhaps it is contemplated that another mechanism for reconciling the sometimes-at-odds interests of the development and production camps is in the works? The 2.2 branch has been good to me but I am realizing the need to get acquainted with 3.0 well before it is in my client's best interest to move to it. For my purposes, some semblance of "stability," in the predictability sense as well as the code quality/reliability sense is necessary first. If it isn't asking for too much of a crystal ball, what can we expect for the future of 3.0 and 2.2? Glen Foster <gfoster@gfoster.com> >Date: Fri, 05 Jun 1998 06:11:27 -0700 >From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> > >(stable) is not going to live >much longer than 1998. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the messagehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199806051432.KAA19172>