Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Jul 1998 17:33:14 +0200
From:      Andreas Klemm <andreas@klemm.gtn.com>
To:        "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com>, "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@Boolean.Net>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: CAM on a -current branch
Message-ID:  <19980714173314.A2988@klemm.gtn.com>
In-Reply-To: <199807140432.WAA00729@narnia.plutotech.com>; from Justin T. Gibbs on Mon, Jul 13, 1998 at 10:32:07PM -0600
References:  <35AA3D71.84F37A20@Boolean.Net> <199807140432.WAA00729@narnia.plutotech.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 13, 1998 at 10:32:07PM -0600, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> 
> Softupdates on a reasonably fast disk under CAM seems to wedge machines
> here.  There have been other reports of CCD having similar effects.

Huh, 'though I don't have very fast disks I should perhaps stay away
from using CAM ? I'm using ccd and softupdates ...

How unstable is it would you say ? I can't remember reports concerning
this ...

-- 
Andreas Klemm                                http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas
     What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ?
          http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html
             "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs)      ``powered by FreeBSD SMP''

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980714173314.A2988>