Date: Wed, 19 Aug 1998 05:03:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: jbryant@unix.tfs.net Cc: peter.jeremy@auss2.alcatel.com.au, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: proposal to not change time_t Message-ID: <199808190503.WAA01910@usr06.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199808190235.VAA12287@unix.tfs.net> from "Jim Bryant" at Aug 18, 98 09:35:36 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> conversion would be best done in steps. if we do it now, it is likely > that our method could be adopted by the large commercial unix > companies out there, say five or ten years from now, sooner if they > want to stay ahead of Mickey$oft. > > i'm just surprised the csrg didn't do this. Like, what, reserving 32 bits adjacent, in the right byte order, in the struct dinode? 8-) 8-). Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808190503.WAA01910>