Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 18:03:30 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> To: jdp@polstra.com (John Polstra) Cc: jonny@jonny.eng.br, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern subr_bus.c uipc_socket2.c Message-ID: <199809070103.SAA13578@bubba.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <199809061801.LAA00223@austin.polstra.com> from John Polstra at "Sep 6, 98 11:01:23 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Polstra writes: > > BTW: How far are we from using -Wall -Werror for the whole source > > tree, including kernel ? > > We should never add -Werror to the standard flags. If somebody > compiles without "-O", the compiler generates spurious warnings. > These kill the build if -Werror is present. That's arguable. Anyone who's capable of removing the -O from some included makefile is capable of removing -Werror from some included makefile. In practice, however, -Werror may not be workable... it would be an interesting experiment anyway. > Of course, we should still strive for the goal of "-O -Wall -Werror" > working. Not to mention -Wstrict-prototypes, -Wmissing-prototypes, -Wmissing-declarations, -Wnested-externs, ... what else?? -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809070103.SAA13578>