Date: Mon, 28 Dec 1998 13:17:47 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Kenneth Wayne Culver <culverk@wam.umd.edu> Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: So we're stuck with using timidity now? Message-ID: <199812280517.NAA62889@spinner.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Dec 1998 00:04:33 EST." <Pine.GSO.3.95q.981228000206.24007A-100000@rac1.wam.umd.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > > Like I said before... Just use OSS/FreeBSD... It is better than VoxWare > > > anyway. And with some talking to Dev at 4-front tech, I'm sure an > > > agreement could be made. > > > > OSS is better. Better at panicing my system. Lets use the homegrown > > solutions before we start implementing a _known_ buggy module. > > Are you using the newest OSS? Also, Dev at 4-front tech has told me that > the problem with his software panicing the kernel is because of problems > with FreeBSD's virtual memory system. So do we need to fix that, or do we > need to make Dev find a non-existant workaround (he has already looked for > one)?? I think that problem has been fixed, a month or two ago. contigmalloc() was doing some silly things. > Kenneth Culver Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199812280517.NAA62889>