Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 12:01:14 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> Cc: nate@mt.sri.com (Nate Williams), cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Problem with "cvs" on freefall (fwd Message-ID: <199901231901.MAA26836@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199901231858.KAA18296@bubba.whistle.com> References: <199901231754.KAA26595@mt.sri.com> <199901231858.KAA18296@bubba.whistle.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > > > Would you be so kind as to rebuild the "cvs" binary on freefall using > > > > > the latest sources? > > > > At work we use CVS exensively, and we've had 'strange' problems using > > CVS 1.10 on repositories built with CVS 1.9 when mixing different > > versions of the cvs binary. (The remote version is different from the > > local version, etc...) > > > > I'm not (yet) convinced that CVS 1.10 is ready for use in mixed > > environments, and since CVS 1.9 is the default FreeBSD version, I > > wouldn't switch. > > I'm not talking about using 1.10.. all I did to get it to work > was check out (from HEAD) contrib/cvs and gnu/usr.bin/cvs, and > do a build in the latter. Since we haven't imported 1.10, this > still builds 1.9. You mean that the binary on freefall isn't the most current freefall version. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199901231901.MAA26836>