Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 01:27:16 +0000 (GMT) From: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> To: witr@rwwa.com (Robert Withrow) Cc: dcs@newsguy.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: more modular rc/init/uninit system... Message-ID: <199902060127.SAA23350@usr02.primenet.com> In-Reply-To: <199902051331.IAA23625@spooky.rwwa.com> from "Robert Withrow" at Feb 5, 99 08:31:42 am
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> dcs@newsguy.com said: > :- Yep. I'm not against run states, just against run levels. > > I'm against both! See my earlier remarks about configuration mamagement. How do you propose to solve the Solaris binary compatability problem for commercial Solaris applications that install components into the rc.d directories in order to get them run at the correct time and in the correct order for dependent services requirements? Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902060127.SAA23350>