Date: Tue, 16 Feb 1999 22:13:02 +1300 From: Andrew McNaughton <andrew@squiz.co.nz> To: cjclark@home.com Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CA-99-03-FTP-Buffer-Overflows Message-ID: <199902160913.WAA17654@aniwa.sky> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 15 Feb 1999 22:13:07 CDT." <199902160313.WAA29938@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> See, > > http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-99-03-FTP-Buffer-Overflows.html > > For the full text. > > Is FreeBSD vunerable? I hope that this, > > > % NetBSD > > > > % NetBSD All versions ARE NOT vulnerable. > > Implies FreeBSD is neither. I know FreeBSD and NetBSD use the same > ftp, but ftpd? Just looking for verification. Thanks. I found it rather curious that FreeBSD's ftpd was not mentioned. Particularly as the PGP signature's version ID said FreeBSD was used, implying that it would have been around for testing. Andrew McNaughton To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902160913.WAA17654>