Date: Thu, 25 Feb 1999 00:03:15 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: Jos Backus <Jos.Backus@nl.origin-it.com>, Dmitrij Tejblum <dima@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: panic: zone: entry not free Message-ID: <199902250803.AAA01163@apollo.backplane.com> References: <19990223094120.A97001@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com> <199902230909.MAA01169@tejblum.dnttm.rssi.ru> <19990223105939.D97001@hal.mpn.cp.philips.com> <36D329D1.73146EEF@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:Jos Backus wrote:
:>
:> > That is, INVARIANTS in kernel incompatible with dynamic loading.
:>
:> Somehow this strikes me as a Bad Thing...
:
:Invariants is not for the production minded. It is for those who
:work with things likely to get broken. Say, for instance, -current.
::-)
:
:--
:Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
I would disagree with that. Invariants are for people who want
their data to be as safe as possible and don't mind eating a little
cpu doing extra sanity checks in the kernel. It is something I would
almost certainly enable in a production kernel.
DIAGNOSTIC, on the otherhand, is something I would only enable in
an extreme test environment.
:dcs@newsguy.com
:dcs@freebsd.org
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902250803.AAA01163>