Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Apr 1999 13:08:29 +1000
From:      Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
To:        ache@nagual.pp.ru, jdp@polstra.com
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: /sys/boot, egcs vs. gcc, -Os
Message-ID:  <199904080308.NAA02002@godzilla.zeta.org.au>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> it seems that boot2 needs to be reduced, and I don't know why it becomes
>> that big and what can be reduced. First candidates are static cmd[512] and
>> kernel[1024]. Please fix so it can be still compiled with gcc.
>
>Why?  The compiler in -current is egcs, not gcc.  If  you want to
>use the old compiler, then use the old sources for boot too.

Everything should be buildable with CC=aac (any ANSI compiler), but
that's asking too much for programs like kernels and boot blocks.

Bruce


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904080308.NAA02002>