Date: Wed, 28 Apr 1999 09:58:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Jim Shankland <jas@flyingfox.com> To: dillon@apollo.backplane.com Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Our routed - Vern says it's old and buggy. Message-ID: <199904281658.JAA01524@biggusdiskus.flyingfox.com> In-Reply-To: <199904272341.QAA01360@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> writes: > Given the choice between OSPF and RIP1/2, OSPF is far superior > even on 'simple' networks. It is effectively an open protocol, > like BGP. Matt, can you clarify what you mean by "open" here? I know it's what the "O" in OSPF stands for, but in what way are OSPF and BGP more open than RIP? Jim Shankland NLynx Systems, Inc. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199904281658.JAA01524>