Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 05:44:06 -0700 From: Aaron Smith <aaron-fbsd@arctic.org> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: John Baldwin <jobaldwi@vt.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>, John Baldwin <jobaldwi@smtp4.erols.com>, Doug <DougGuy@dal.net> Subject: Re: Inetd and wrapping. Message-ID: <199906251244.FAA30357@sigma.veritas.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:14:48 %2B0200." <191.930298488@axl.noc.iafrica.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 25 Jun 1999 10:14:48 +0200, Sheldon Hearn writes: >I think I prefer the suggestion I saw from someone else, which would >allow > >ftp stream tcp nowait/10/10/wrap root ... > >This can be done in such a way as to be backward compatible. Looks like >something for the week-end, if I can convince my wife that it's a good >idea. :-) could you please restate the argument for this? i still haven't heard a decent reason for this sort of conf format perturbation. every small whack like this makes freebsd weirder to administrate -- there is a value to sharing the same inetd.conf format with lots of other platforms. if people have their undies in a wad over this, can't they compile inetd without LIBWRAP? aaron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906251244.FAA30357>