Date: Thu, 8 Jul 1999 22:04:50 -0400 From: Tim Vanderhoek <vanderh@ecf.utoronto.ca> To: Nik Clayton <nik@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk> Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@scc.nl>, obrien@FreeBSD.org, Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/linux-base-5.2 - Imported sources Message-ID: <19990708220450.C29714@mad> In-Reply-To: <19990708223740.A3633@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>; from Nik Clayton on Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 10:37:40PM %2B0100 References: <6514.931435144@axl.noc.iafrica.com> <3784953E.20F2005E@scc.nl> <19990708114649.A67400@dragon.nuxi.com> <3784FA51.639E1920@scc.nl> <19990708223740.A3633@catkin.nothing-going-on.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 10:37:40PM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: > On Thu, Jul 08, 1999 at 09:21:53PM +0200, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > That's why the port is call linux-* instead of redhat-*. It's not RH > > We also don't need 2 ports (or more for > > that matter), I just want to get a new version out in the open before I > > nuke the old one. If this is your only goal, then the port naming was even more wrong than was at first apparent. You should name one of the "linux-base" and one of them "linux-base-devel" if your reason for having 2 ports is as above. I can explain the reasons that the ports system usually uses the above convention, if you want. -- This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990708220450.C29714>