Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 00:30:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Alex Le Heux <alexlh@p.funk.org> To: kris@airnet.net, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 3C905 versus Intel Etherexpress PRO/100?! Message-ID: <199907122230.AAA25713@p.funk.org> In-Reply-To: <list.freebsd.chat#378972B9.CB0912C4@airnet.net> References: <list.freebsd.chat#378972B9.CB0912C4@airnet.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
We're talking about a 2% difference in cpu utilisation here. Is that even statistically significant? Even if it is, the difference is tiny, and probably mostly in the driver. Use whichever card works best on the OS you use it on. Alex In list.freebsd.chat, you wrote: >I'd like to know what they did here, because in my own experience the >evidence points the other way. > ><http://www.3com.com/solutions/200399.html>; >-- >Kris Kirby ><kris@airnet.net> >------------------------------------------- >TGIFreeBSD... 'Nuff said. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message -- +--------------------------------+-------------------+ | SMTP: <alexlh@funk.org> | E-Gold: 101979 | | ICBM: N52 22.64'6 E4 51.54'1 | PGP: 0x1d512a3f | +--------------------------------+-------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907122230.AAA25713>