Date: Sat, 18 Sep 1999 23:34:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, imp@village.org (Warner Losh), liam@tiora.net (Liam Slusser), kdrobnac@mission.mvnc.edu (Kenny Drobnack), Harry_M_Leitzell@cmu.edu (Harry M. Leitzell), security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BPF on in 3.3-RC GENERIC kernel Message-ID: <199909190634.XAA68995@apollo.backplane.com> References: <14489.937722438@critter.freebsd.dk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
:You have not proved or even shown that changing this particular
:element will be enough to guarantee that we can support other
:protocols in the future.
:
:The only thing that can be done to the jail(2) syscall to improve
:it in that respect is to add a version number as the first element,
:I would have no problem with that.
:
:--
:Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
Well, I see it quite differently. I believe I have given ample
justification for asking that the system call be cleaned up before it
is exposed to wider use. You're making a blanket comments saying
"Matt hasn't proved..." and not even trying to address the issues
brought up doesn't really pull any weight with me. Try addressing
the issues that were brought up instead.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199909190634.XAA68995>