Date: Mon, 20 Sep 1999 03:36:33 +0900 From: "R. Imura" <imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> To: andy@cgu.chel.su Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, cpiazza@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources Message-ID: <19990920033633G.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> In-Reply-To: <199909191144.RAA06647@mail.cgu.chel.su> References: <19990919174041U.imura@cs.titech.ac.jp> <199909191144.RAA06647@mail.cgu.chel.su> <vqczoyjqnd3.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi,
From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources
Date: 19 Sep 1999 02:09:11 -0700
> I'm not sure if you are being sarcastic here, but if you want me to
No, I was not.
That was just for my curiosity.
Asami-san's explanation is very easy to understand.
Thank you.
From: Andrey Zakhvatov <andy@cgu.chel.su>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-toolkits/qt2 - Imported sources
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 17:44:00 +0600 (ESS)
> And another question: Should we _strongly_ push X applications to use
> ${LOCALBASE} as ${PREFIX}, leave ${X11BASE} for only X11 system staff?
> I prefer using ${X11BASE} as ${PREFIX} for _all_ X related applications, but..
> What your opinions?
I think so, too.
But, for example in the KDE's case, It have been difficult to install
${X11BASE} for me. I think it is better KDE installed to ${X11BASE}.
Now I'm testing to do so by using idea of PR #13800. It may be possible.
Does this trial have any problem?
I'll change qt201/qt-i18n tomorrow.
Thanks.
---
R. Imura
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990920033633G.imura>