Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 19:08:47 -0500 (EST) From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> To: regnauld@ftf.net (Phil Regnauld) Cc: jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (Jonathon McKitrick), freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Uptime ! (507 days and going) Message-ID: <199912310008.TAA91293@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com> In-Reply-To: <19991224172048.17894@ns.int.ftf.net> from Phil Regnauld at "Dec 24, 1999 05:20:48 pm"
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Phil Regnauld wrote, > Jonathon McKitrick writes: > > > > That's a lot of data... what command produces those reports? > > /usr/bin/uname -a > /usr/bin/uptime > /usr/bin/vmstat -i > /usr/bin/vmstat -s > /usr/bin/vmstat -m [107:~] uname -a FreeBSD newmail.xxxx.xxx 2.2.8-STABLE FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE #0: Mon May 3 23:00:34 EDT 1999 postman@newmail.xxxx.xxx:/usr/src/sys/compile/NEWMAIL i386 [108:~] uptime 6:51PM up 150 days, 2:44, 1 user, load averages: 0.04, 0.03, 0.00 [109:~] vmstat -i interrupt total rate clk0 irq0 1296951033 99 rtc0 irq8 1660151845 128 fdc0 irq6 60370 0 wdc0 irq14 944831167 72 wdc1 irq15 1 0 sc0 irq1 337 0 sio1 irq3 16735 0 ex0 irq10 58470488 4 Total -334485320 -25 *hrmm...* Is it potentially harmful for these to go negative or roll over (not in vmstat(1) output, but the kernel registers it reads)? Maybe vmstat(1) should be using 'unsigned long's rather than 'long's? -- Crist J. Clark cjclark@home.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the messagehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912310008.TAA91293>