Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 22:52:35 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] linprocfs dofilesystems Message-ID: <1bd550a01001261352h1ecc22dbh8fd2dcf9c8ac51c5@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201001151110.29417.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <1bd550a01001080919p20ec1b20t82b3761705cd1ff3@mail.gmail.com> <201001151110.29417.jhb@freebsd.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
2010/1/15 John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>: > On Friday 08 January 2010 12:19:29 pm Fernando Apesteguía wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This patch implements the "filesystems" file in the linux proc fs. >> I have used it for some time without seeing any problems. Let me >> know in case this is useful. >> >> Tested against 8.0-RELEASE-p1 > > This patch is not correct. It seems that /proc/filesystems is a list of > available filesystems, not a list of mounted filesystems. E.g.: > >> cat /proc/filesystems > nodev sysfs > nodev rootfs > nodev bdev > nodev proc > nodev sockfs > nodev binfmt_misc > nodev usbfs > nodev usbdevfs > nodev futexfs > nodev tmpfs > nodev pipefs > nodev eventpollfs > nodev devpts > ext2 > nodev ramfs > nodev hugetlbfs > iso9660 > nodev relayfs > nodev mqueue > ext3 > nodev rpc_pipefs > nodev nfs > nodev nfs4 > nodev autofs > > To do the same thing in FreeBSD you would need to walk the vfsconf list > instead. However, I'm not sure it is worth it to add this unless there > are apps people commonly use that need it. You are right. I have another patch to do the right thing. However as you pointed out maybe it is not useful after all. Is it possible to delete the PR? Sorry for the noise PS: My current patch does not distinguish between common filesystems and pseudo filesystems, where could I find that info? Cheers > > -- > John Baldwin >home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1bd550a01001261352h1ecc22dbh8fd2dcf9c8ac51c5>