Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 17:22:14 +0800 From: Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@FreeBSD.org> To: Erwin Lansing <erwin@freebsd.org> Cc: python@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS Message-ID: <1e39c0a90907120222m4d0d7736ga6a7221e514b836b@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090710145547.GE86673@droso.net> References: <200907091332.n69DWgXF055913@pointyhat.freebsd.org> <1e39c0a90907091948i5b11a4fdrb0d75cd08f245eac@mail.gmail.com> <20090710145547.GE86673@droso.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 22:55, Erwin Lansing<erwin@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 10:48:41AM +0800, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 21:32, Erwin Lansing<erwin@freebsd.org> wrote: >> > LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER >> > ========================================================================== >> > py25-bsddb databases/py-bsddb perky@FreeBSD.org >> > py25-bsddb databases/py25-bsddb python@FreeBSD.org >> >> I think these two are not an issue. Default Python version is switched to 2.6. >> >> But how this report generated? Switching happened before >> databases/py25-bsddb repocpoied. >> > The script is in Tools/scripts/check-latest-link. Could this be caused > by the installed python version on the system it runs on? Sounds possible, and that's what bsd.python.mk does. databases/py25-bsddb is a slave port of databases/py-bsddb, which generates python 2.5 package for some ports depend on specified python version. When a system with python 2.5 as the default setting, databases/py-bsddb and databases/py25-bsddb should generate same package. So now the problem is, is it OK for them have same LATEST_LINK? Or we can just ignore this problem, since this should not effect official package build, and the latest links on the ftp. -- Li-Wen Hsu http://lwhsu.orghelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1e39c0a90907120222m4d0d7736ga6a7221e514b836b>