Date: Fri, 7 Jan 100 23:46:49 +1100 (EST) From: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> To: imp@village.org (Warner Losh) Cc: joe@pavilion.net, darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au, dillon@apollo.backplane.com, committers@FreeBSD.org, current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 4.0 code freeze scheduled for Jan 15th Message-ID: <200001071246.XAA05593@avalon.reed.wattle.id.au> In-Reply-To: <200001062246.PAA80310@harmony.village.org> from "Warner Losh" at Jan 6, 0 03:46:22 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In some email I received from Warner Losh, sie wrote: > > In message <20000106212050.D95011@florence.pavilion.net> Josef Karthauser writes: > : My 3c589d works just fine now, along with suspend/resume :) (under 4.0). > > The issue with the 3c589d is with its speed. It is falling back to > the timeout routine to send data rather than getting an interrupt when > the tx has happened (or something like this, I'm reporting second hand > stuff). Whatever it is, results in ping times being 1000ms then 10ms then 1000ms then 10ms...when it responds. i.e. it's a mistake to use FreeBSD 3.x with the 3c589d. Darren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001071246.XAA05593>