Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 13:08:18 +0530 From: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> To: "Matthew N. Dodd" <mdodd@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: How often to commit? (was: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa if_ex.c) Message-ID: <20000115130818.G349@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <200001130646.WAA05126@freefall.freebsd.org>; from mdodd@FreeBSD.org on Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 10:46:03PM -0800 References: <200001130655.WAA06049@freefall.freebsd.org> <200001130652.WAA05820@freefall.freebsd.org> <200001130646.WAA05126@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 12 January 2000 at 22:46:03 -0800, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > mdodd 2000/01/12 22:46:03 PST > > Modified files: > sys/i386/isa if_ex.c On Wednesday, 12 January 2000 at 22:52:52 -0800, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > mdodd 2000/01/12 22:52:52 PST > > Modified files: > sys/i386/isa if_ex.c On Wednesday, 12 January 2000 at 22:55:35 -0800, Matthew N. Dodd wrote: > mdodd 2000/01/12 22:55:35 PST > > Modified files: > sys/i386/isa if_ex.c When I see messages like this, all containing relatively small modifications, I wonder if we should come to some agreement on how often a commit should be made for modules on which we're actively working. I'm not picking on mdodd (well, only in the sense that I noticed these three commits); I'm just wondering. I tend to go to the other extreme myself, testing changes in some detail before making a mega-commit. I suspect that the truth lies somewhere between these two extremes. Would anybody like to discuss where it might be? Greg -- Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000115130818.G349>