Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2000 02:09:18 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au> To: Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> Cc: David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin Makefile src/usr.bin/uac Makefile uac.1 uac.c Message-ID: <20000119180918.70B8D1CD4@overcee.netplex.com.au> In-Reply-To: Message from Guido van Rooij <guido@gvr.org> of "Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:11:00 %2B0100." <20000119181100.B8394@gvr.gvr.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Guido van Rooij wrote: > On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 02:05:01AM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 19, 2000 at 10:55:54AM +0100, Guido van Rooij wrote: > > > Doesn't this belong in usr.bin/alpha? > > > > There isn't such a thing. But it is conditional in src/usr.bin/Makefile. > > So I noticed. But having an acrhitecture dependent directory > seems the way to do it in the man page section as well as in src/sbin. Is it necessarily Alpha specific? What about sparc? MIPS? other risc cpus that might require manual fixups for unaligned accesses? If it's applicable to them down the track then it's (IMHO) in the right place. Cheers, -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000119180918.70B8D1CD4>