Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:25:23 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: "C. Stephen Gunn" <csg@dustdevil.waterspout.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 802.1Q VLANs Message-ID: <200002141625.LAA65769@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <20000214002142.A12511@dustdevil.waterspout.com> References: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0002031711230.1338-100000@haddock.euitt.upm.es> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002031236160.479-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <200002031847.NAA62013@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <20000214002142.A12511@dustdevil.waterspout.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:21:42 -0500, "C. Stephen Gunn" <csg@dustdevil.waterspout.com> said: > Right now untagged traffic (on a mixed link) is presented to the > upper protocol layers by the parent device. This isn't quite > kosher since 802.1Q states this should be routed to the "default" > VLAN for the given interface. 802.1Q defines how bridges work, not how operating systems work. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200002141625.LAA65769>