Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Feb 2000 16:06:29 -0800
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To:        Zander Collier <zcollier@cncx.com>
Cc:        emulation@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: sbwait state question
Message-ID:  <20000218160628.C21720@fw.wintelcom.net>
In-Reply-To: <38ADD5A3.DF7EB7F5@cncx.com>; from zcollier@cncx.com on Fri, Feb 18, 2000 at 03:28:35PM -0800
References:  <38ADD5A3.DF7EB7F5@cncx.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Zander Collier <zcollier@cncx.com> [000218 16:00] wrote:
> I am running a server with a 3rd party server app that has upwards of
> 30 clients connecting to it at a time.  It is supposed to accept up
> to 127 simultaneously.  In the course of the day and in
> the use of the server, it is often falling into the state (as listed
> in top) of sbwait.  This means that while it is in 'sbwait' mode
> the process is locked up and no one can do anything while connected to
> it.  It will remain locked like this for upwards of 5 minutes and the
> shortest lockup was about 30 seconds.  One time it was so long, I
> killed and restarted the process.
> 
> I am running FreeBSD 3.4 and the Linux Compatibility libraries.

Hmm, I rarely move something from -questions to another list, but this
seems interesting because I remeber some threads about how Linux does
socket stuff differently than FreeBSD, notably that certain file/socket
flags aren't passed to accept()'d connections.

Does this ring a bell with anyone?

If not the name of the actuall program and possibly an evaluation copy
for one of people working on emulation would be very helpful.

-Alfred


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000218160628.C21720>