Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2000 23:33:26 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@bart.nl> To: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ab.ca> Subject: Re: status of 'device awe' ? Message-ID: <20000222233325.A14094@lucifer.bart.nl> In-Reply-To: <XFMail.000223084942.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>; from doconnor@gsoft.com.au on Wed, Feb 23, 2000 at 08:49:42AM %2B1030 References: <20000222132327.O5555@lucifer.bart.nl> <XFMail.000223084942.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-On [20000222 23:25], Daniel O'Connor (doconnor@gsoft.com.au) wrote: > >On 22-Feb-00 Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote: >> Should be used instead. >> I am so in favor of just declaring voxware dead... But the armchair >> generals wouldn't like that. > >The awe device controls the AWE's wavetable.. newpcm doesn't talk to this >(yet - no idea if there are any plans) newmidi is underway... That's why I wanted to kill voxware in 4.0, would allow pcm to be used from default... Now we're stuck to the voxware crap for another release cycle until 5.0 hits the public. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator <asmodai@bart.nl> bART Internet Services / BSD: Technical excellence at its best VIA NET.WORKS Netherlands Tel: +31 - (0) 10 - 240 39 70 http://www.bart.nl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000222233325.A14094>