Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 09:19:43 +1300 From: Joe Abley <jabley@patho.gen.nz> To: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is FreeBSD dead? Well, not in theory... Message-ID: <20000313091940.B18713@patho.gen.nz> In-Reply-To: <200003122012.PAA00812@etinc.com>; from dennis@etinc.com on Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:44:04AM -0500 References: <20000312083736.A27614@patho.gen.nz> <200003101840.NAA12885@etinc.com> <Pine.BSF.4.05.10003111306520.14049-100000@bsd1.nyct.net> <200003111841.NAA17534@etinc.com> <20000312083736.A27614@patho.gen.nz> <20000312193205.W68308@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <200003122012.PAA00812@etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 03:44:04AM -0500, Dennis wrote: > At 07:32 PM 3/12/00 +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote: > >That's also why I am wasting my time slowly documenting the FreeBSD > >internals in my spare time. > > "slowly" is the key word here. Real products are documented before they are > in commercial use. Plus by the time you're done they will be > outdated...another common problem. I have yet to find a "real product" with good documentation. > Why are you arguing this point? Is there anyone that believes that Linux > and FreeBSD are well documented? Yes. > Please. The books are out of date before they hit the stores. Books? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000313091940.B18713>