Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2000 10:25:53 -0700 From: Jim Mock <jim@luna.cdrom.com> To: J McKitrick <jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org> Cc: stable <stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: 4.1 date? Message-ID: <20000413102553.B6605@luna.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: <20000413181640.B99705@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org on Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 06:16:41PM %2B0100 References: <20000412183413.A69623@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <20000413101202.A6605@luna.cdrom.com> <20000413181640.B99705@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 13 Apr 2000 at 18:16:41 +0100, J McKitrick wrote: > On Thu, Apr 13, 2000 at 10:12:02AM -0700, Jim Mock wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Apr 2000 at 18:34:14 +0100, J McKitrick wrote: > > > Is there a 4.1 release date slated yet? What are the biggest > > > projects/impediments so far? > > > > Uh, 4.0 just came out a month ago. There are usually 4 releases a year, > > That makes sense. But i just wondered if the 4.1 release would come > out sooner, since there may be a lot of people waiting for the bug > fixes or stable CD version to install. What's wrong with 4.0? I've installed it on quite a few boxes quite a few times, and haven't had any trouble. Also, the 4.0 CDs just started shipping two weeks ago. We do have a turn-around time.. it's not like Jordan rolls the release, burns the CD, sends it off to the replicator's and we have XXXX copies back in 2 hrs to be shipped.. this stuff takes a little time ;-) If people are waiting for 4.1, they shouldn't be; there's no reason for them not to be using 4.0. - jim -- - jim mock - walnut creek cdrom/freebsd test labs - jim@luna.cdrom.com - - phone: 1.925.691.2800 x.3814 - fax: 1.925.674.0821 - jim@FreeBSD.org - - editor - The FreeBSDzine - www.freebsdzine.org - jim@freebsdzine.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000413102553.B6605>