Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 13:37:51 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de> Cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ViM vs. Emacs Message-ID: <20000420133751.A517@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <8dlokp$1kr8$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de>; from naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de on Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 04:05:13AM %2B0200 References: <20000419103521.A2972@cichlids.cichlids.com> <8dlokp$1kr8$1@bigeye.rhein-neckar.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Also sprach Christian Weisgerber (naddy@mips.rhein-neckar.de): > On all those Red Hat/Mandrake Linux boxes "vi" is vim by default. > Very painful, if you are used to nvi from BSD. A few days ago I What do you use what ViM does not provide? > vim on a BSD box where there's a perfectly functional nvi is just > repugnant. How do you do syntax-highlighting in nvi? Alex To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000420133751.A517>