Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2000 01:30:58 +0100 From: void <float@firedrake.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "Yevmenkin, Maksim N, CSCIO" <myevmenkin@att.com>, "'hackers@freebsd.org'" <hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: kerneld for FreeBSD Message-ID: <20000607013058.A32270@firedrake.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006061607330.71092-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>; from kris@FreeBSD.org on Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 04:08:42PM -0700 References: <E598F159668DD311B9C700902799EAF447341C@njb140po01.ems.att.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006061607330.71092-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jun 06, 2000 at 04:08:42PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > You weren't listening..no-one debates the utility of auto-loading modules, > and that is the direction FreeBSD is already heading. The debate is over > the utility of automatically UNLOADING modules when they're "no longer in > use". Doesn't Solaris auto-unload unused drivers when memory gets tight? -- Ben 220 go.ahead.make.my.day ESMTP Postfix To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000607013058.A32270>